Latest Comment

Saturday Musings –...
1. When was the last time you sold a domain? a:...
Saturday Musings –...
Domain owners are becoming more sophisticated beca...
Saturday Musings –...
Michael, For this particular person, where this do...
Saturday Musings –...
Hi Donny, Great to hear from you. You're experienc...
Saturday Musings –...
I completely agree with your points Michael. From...
The Follies of Fraud
Let me explain stealing identity. What many domain...
The Follies of Fraud
I do not understand what you mean by stealing othe...
The Follies of Fraud
Trust me.....I would rather not reject any applica...
The Follies of Fraud
Rejecting 98% of applicants is surely leaving a lo...
The Follies of Fraud
I think that you may be confusing fraudulent accou...
Home Article Archive Domain Analytics Part 9 - Is Google's perfect information really perfect?
Part 9 - Is Google's perfect information really perfect? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
Thursday, 05 June 2008 08:07

After a brief sabbatical from writing for a few days I decided to continue the series on the domain industry and explore the concept of negotiating against someone that has perfect information. You can view the earlier articles in the domain industry series by clicking here.

As we have already explored Google has built its empire on the basis of data manipulation and being able to do this faster and better than the other guy. pokerFrom this basis Google has extended their understanding of the online advertisers supply chain from the advertisement being placed right through to the conversion rates.

It really doesn't matter whether the traffic went via a domain, a Google property or a publishing partner. Everything is tracked and recorded each step of the way by the Google number crunching system.

I enjoy playing poker and it can be a good analogy that may expose some of the weaknesses in Google's informational armour. Let's imagine that Google is playing Texas Holdem with all of the parking companies.

Once all of the cards have been dealt the player representing Google calmly gets up and walks around the table looking at each players cards. All the other players are asked to hold up their hands so that the Google player can get a better look. This is similar to having the informational advantage that Google has carved out at the moment.

The information gained from this walk is invaluable but does it allow Google to win the poker game? After a couple of hands a few of the players get sick of being beaten due to the Google player's unfair advantage and decide to join another table. This happens to be the Yahoo table. This also means that there are less players around the poker table at which Google is playing.

The first challenge for Google is that just because you have perfect information doesn't mean that the other guy won't leave the game. In order for Google to maximize revenue they need to ensure that everyone wants to play poker with them.

If all of the parking companies decide to leave the poker game at the same time then Google's perfect information doesn't help them at all as there isn't a game being played anymore and Solitaire isn't very fun when compared to poker.

Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated on Monday, 28 July 2008 10:54