Blogs about the domain industry and the various players and companies within it.

A Domain Name Association - part 2

This is the second in a multi-part series on how I would approach the establishment of a Domain Name Association. I must say that the feedback has been fantastic to date and that the discussion has been really valuable. I would encourage everyone to take part in the discussion.

The role of the board is to monitor the progress of the association so that it is in line with the guiding principles and vision. The following diagram illustrates the position of the board with respect to the principles and membership.

The board has 3 primary responsibilities:
1. Financial prudence and good governance to ensure that the organisation is solvent.
2. Fulfilling the vision via policies that benefit the different membership classes (more on this later).
3. Empower the executive with the necessary resources to meet the policy objectives

Members of the board may be part of a subcommittee that is involved in management tasks but when they report back to the board they need to act as directors.


In board meetings all directors of the association have a fiduciary responsibility to leave their external objectives (ie. personal and possible employer) and to work for the betterment of the association. This means that at times individuals may find themselves in a conflict of objectives. If this is the case the director will need to notify the board of a possible conflict and have it minuted that they have excused themselves from future deliberations on that particular issue. Typically, this will also involve the individual leaving the board meeting physical for a short time.

Issues such as the one above will need to be addressed as a part of the code of conduct that each and every director would need to sign prior to becoming a director.

Board Structure

Other than the CEO all board positions are for a maximum term of 2 years. Any director can serve for a maximum of 3 consecutive terms (ie. a total of 6 years) prior to having to rotate off the board. After being off the board for a term they may then offer their candidacy for election. This will then force a rotation in the board and ensure that fresh ideas are constantly being brought forward by new directors.

The board may initially be formed with a cascading terms (ie. some positions deemed as being already served for 1,2 or 3 terms) so that all elections for all board positions do not fall at the same time.

All board positions are only accessible either via:
1. Election in a particular category class.
2. Appointment by the board to assist in its proper functioning.
3. Chief Executive Officer

Under the guidance of the three overarching principles of inclusive, representative and transparent I would suggest the following structure for a fully functioning board. The category and classes of available board seats are derived from the various “freedoms” that are core to the vision outlined in part 1 of the series.


No. Seats


General User
Regular domain owner





Domain Investor
Invest in domains as a business model





Domain Supply
registries, registrars





parking, zero click, affiliate





Domain Sales
brokers, marketplaces





Designers, business developers





Board reserved





Members that can possibly be in multiple classes must choose which class they represent at the time of becoming a member. This means that members can ONLY represent a single class. Members with multiple associated organisations may only represent one class. For example, if a member is a part of a group of companies that has both a parking company and a registrar then they must choose which class that they represent. This is to avoid any individual company potentially seizing multiple board seats with different affiliated companies.

To be geographically inclusive there needs to be at least three continents represented on the board. If there isn’t then the board can use one of its two reserved seats and appoint a director from a region to fulfill this objective.

The classes of A, B and C represents bands of size (by revenue). For example, there may be 5 domain investor members that qualify for the class A director seat. Any of these member may offer themselves up for their class’s board seat. If there is more than one member offering their services to the association for a single position then the other members in that class may vote whom they would like to represent their class on the board. In the event that there is a tie the current board chairmen has a casting vote to break the deadlock.

No board seat is automatically awarded to any member that “pays” for the position. All members are treated equally in their class and all directors have equal voting rights within the board itself.

This structure for the board will mean that it is inclusive, representative and transparent. All members will have an opportunity to become a director, represent their membership class and elections will be transparent and open. This would then satisfy the guiding principles of the association.

I would like to make it clear that these are my thoughts on how I believe that a domain association could be established. This is not meant to be disparaging against any existing associations in anyway whatsoever (eg. ICA, etc.). I’m sure that this article will provoke a great deal of thought and hopefully comment. It is my belief that it’s through open discussion that a better outcome can be achieved.

  2806 Hits
2806 Hits

Domain Association - Part 1

Over the last few months I’ve been doing a lot of thinking on the topic of establishing a domain industry association for everyone. The domain industry is being rocked by forces that as individuals we have little control over but as a corporate body we could directly influence.

In the following series of articles I would like to tackle the topic in the following manner:
1.    The associations vision and overarching principles
2.    Constitution, board and elections
3.    Purpose of the executive
4.    Benefits to members

I welcome any and all feedback on the topic as I personally believe that it is critical that we work together to achieve a better outcome for us all. I should also state up front that I don’t believe that I have all of the answers but that I am prepared to kick the ball into play.

Principles and Vision

When you think of successful associations they have a number of guiding principles that underpin the ethos of how the organisation functions, makes decisions and interacts with members. The following are proposed as the principles that should be central to a domain association:
1.    Inclusive
2.    Representative
3.    Transparent

The association should embrace all stakeholders from within the domain industry. Everyone from the end-user wishing to protect their intellectual property rights through to registries, registrars and monetisation partners. Policies ratified by the board need to be for the betterment of the future of the majority of the stakeholders – note that this doesn’t necessary mean all stakeholders.


Being inclusive also means that the association must be truly global. Although the USA founded the Internet, amidst the pressures of the cold war, it has now become a global utility for all of humanity. The structure and foundation of the association needs to reflect this migration.

As much as the association is inclusive it must also be representative. This means that the board must reflect all the stakeholders from all the geographic regions and not just the members with the biggest pockets. A truly representative board would reflect the structure of the membership and also be a hotbed of innovation solutions to what are sometimes intractable problems.
A lot more on the board later.

One of the major problems with the domain industry is the lack of transparency. The association needs to be transparent in the manner in which it operates and as a matter of policy work with the key stakeholders to help change the way the industry behaves so that the industry can grow.


So what is the vision for the association? First of all it needs to be something that all stakeholders can embrace to a greater or lesser degree. Something simple such as:

“The freedom to be innovative in the development of online destinations with domain names.”

Internet user:  

Freedom to go where I want.
Do you realise that apps create a walled garden etc.

Domain Owner:

Freedom to build my investment portfolio.
I should be able to invest where I want to invest.

Registry & Registrar:

Freedom to have domains used.
User’s should be able to stake their plot of land on the Internet with a domain name.


Freedom to sell direct navigation.
Investors should be able to sell their domain traffic to whomever they please.


Freedom to sell (in some jurisdictions this is still very difficult)
I should be able to sell or buy a domain if I want to.

A key word in the vision is innovation. One of the many problems in the domain monetisation industry is that Google has sought to block innovation through legal means, ultimately control of the pages themselves and a lack of transparency of payments. The stifling of innovative approaches to monetisation needs to be urgently addressed.

I initially had the word business rather than destination but I believe that the internet is bigger than business. It’s about places that people want to find and explore. It’s about people that help other people and where everyone can have a voice….therefore they are destinations.

As I said in the introductory article, this will be a series that I hope provokes a lot of discussion….so feel free to contribute!

  3113 Hits
3113 Hits

Why I'm not buying into the new gTLDs

With the all-pervasive hysteria about the new gTLDs I feel like I’m going a bit against the flow. So why aren’t I getting into a buying frenzy and forking out wads of cash?

In a previous blog I talked about having a business model for each domain name that I own, the problem is I can’t see a business model with the new gTLDs.

Let’s just think about it for a second; they won’t have any traffic, with the glut of opportunities available they won’t really be that sellable and I don’t need another domain to build into business (I’ve got enough to last a lifetime!). Hmmm… what is the business model? How am I going to get my return on my investment? I’m not…plain and simple.

On top of there not being a business model I find that it’s also all about focus. Since 2014 started ParkLogic is has been going through a massive growth spurt and we’re in the middle of a major developmental project. We hope to have this ready for release at DomainFest at the end of March. I don’t want to lose my focus from ParkLogic on something that is more of a gamble playing the lottery.

So when you place your hard earned cash on the table ask yourself two simple questions:
1.    What is my return on my investment?
2.    When will this happen?

If you can’t ask these questions then I suggest that you attend TRAFFIC in Las Vegas and put your money on the roulette wheel. At least you may have some fun!

  4688 Hits
4688 Hits

Donna Takes the Plunge!

Donna Mahony has made the big decision to leap into the world of blogging. For those of you that don’t know, Donna is the queen of the domain forums and has run for many, many years. is a closed forum that is only accessible by applicants being approved by the entire community. It’s amazing to see competitors, domain owners and other industry professionals discussing domain topics and working together for the betterment of the industry.

I know that Donna has a huge amount of expertise in the domain industry and as she says on her very first blog…..she’s going to bring her own point of view to the articles that she writes. So get ready for some great reading!

I would like to wish Donna good luck and every success and would highly recommend that you place her blog on your watch list!

You can visit Donna’s Blog at not surprisingly

  3414 Hits
3414 Hits

2014 - The Year Ahead

  3234 Hits
3234 Hits